US SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Forced Encrypted Asset Disclosure Framework: Paradigm

According to reports, Web3 venture capital firm Paradigm published a policy article today on SEC registration issues in the United States. The article states that US SEC Chairman Gary Gensler “attempted to forcibly include encrypted assets that may not even constitute ‘securities’ in an inappropriate disclosure framework, which is a bad policy.” The agency pointed out that the SEC failed to provide users and investors of encrypted assets with the information they needed, and also denied the SEC’s claim that the regulatory agency provided a feasible compliance path for crypto entrepreneurs. Paradigm stated that the current information disclosure policy was formulated in the 1930s long before the emergence of the internet, and the current policy is “tailored for centralized companies issuing securities,” while the crypto market is fundamentally different. The institution added that securities provide holders with legal rights over centralized entities, however, most cryptocurrencies do not have “legal rights” and only have “technical capabilities in the protocol”. （Cointelegraph）

Paradigm: The US SEC’s attempt to regulate encryption is a “bad policy”

Introduction

Recently, Web3 venture capital firm Paradigm has released an article highlighting the registration issues that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is facing when it comes to encrypted assets. According to the report, US SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has attempted to include encrypted assets in an inappropriate disclosure framework that may not even fall under the category of securities. The article argues that the information disclosure policy that the SEC provides for crypto entrepreneurs is outdated and tailored for centralized companies issuing securities. In this article, we will discuss the details mentioned in the article by Paradigm.

The SEC’s Failure to Provide Necessary Information

In the article, Paradigm points out that the SEC has failed to provide users and investors of encrypted assets with the necessary information they require. According to them, the SEC’s claim that it has provided a feasible compliance path for crypto entrepreneurs is not true. Paradigm believes that the SEC is trying to force encrypted assets into a regulatory framework that they do not essentially belong to.

The Outdated Information Disclosure Policy

The current information disclosure policy that the SEC has in place was formulated in the 1930s, which is way before the internet came into being. The policy was tailored for centralized companies issuing securities, and it does not fit into the modern crypto market that exists today. Paradigm believes that the crypto market is fundamentally different from the traditional securities market, and outlining regulations for crypto assets requires a new set of rules.

Legal Rights vs. Technical Capabilities

Paradigm argues that the current regulations that the SEC has in place are tailored towards centralized entities that are issuing securities. The issue here is that securities provide holders with legal rights over the centralized entity, something that is not applicable to most cryptocurrencies. Most cryptocurrencies lack legal rights, and their capabilities are only limited to their technical protocols.

The Need for a New Regulatory Framework

Web3 venture capital firm Paradigm believes that a new regulatory framework is necessary to govern the crypto assets market. They believe that the SEC should not try and fit cryptocurrencies into the same policy that governs traditional securities. Instead, the SEC should recognize that digital assets are fundamentally different, and a new set of robust regulations are needed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Paradigm’s article highlights the challenges that the SEC has in regulating encrypted assets. They have observed that Chairman Gensler has been attempting to force these assets into a regulatory framework made for traditional securities. This is not only inappropriate but also needs to be addressed through a new regulatory framework tailored to fit the fundamentally different crypto market.

FAQs

1. **What is the SEC’s current policy on encrypted assets?** The SEC’s current policy on encrypted assets is outdated and tailored for centralized companies issuing securities.
2. **What are the legal rights of most cryptocurrencies?** Most cryptocurrencies lack legal rights, and their capabilities are only limited to their technical protocols.
3. **What is Paradigm’s stance on encrypted asset regulations?** Paradigm believes that a new regulatory framework is necessary to govern the crypto assets market, recognizing that digital assets are fundamentally different.
—